Select Page

News & Commentary

Editorial: Why does NM give elk-hunt permits to private landowners, fire commissioners who question the status quo?

By Albuquerque Journal Editorial Board

This editorial looks at the current flawed system in which New Mexico Game and Fish Commissioners are appointed and removed by the Governor with little to no oversight. This year, two commissioners were dismissed because their positions clashed with those of the governor. All appointed commissioners are supposed to by confirmed by the state Senate, although that has not happened in recent years.  “The system is stacked so the only qualification to serve is showing fealty to the governor rather than making independent decisions about a resource you’re entrusted to manage and protect on behalf of the residents of New Mexico. That has to change.” State lawmakers should pass a bill that would protect commissioners from being removed simply for disagreeing with the governor on a singular issue, allowing them to do the job they were appointed to do.

Read more at Albuquerque Journal

Three new Vermont Fish and Wildlife Board members with a love of hunting appointed without due process

By Emma Cotton

Gov. Phil Scott of Vermont recently appointed three new members to the state’s Fish and Wildlife Board. “All three cite a love of hunting that began during childhood.” Qualified candidates, including a retired environmental sciences teacher as well as a wildlife rehabber, submitted applications – yet never received any reply. Meanwhile, Scott appointed members who never submitted an application, making it clear that the Governor operates without transparency. The public has no information on these board members who are making public policy decisions on our shared public “asset” – wildlife!

Appointments to commissions need to be transparent and follow due process.

Read more at VT Digger

Conserving – not killing – wildlife should drive Wisconsin’s natural resources strategy

By Fred Koontz & Adrian Treves

This op-ed, co-authored by Wildlife for All board member Adrian Treves and Fred Koontz, examines Wisconsin’s Department of Natural Resources and its priorities (which are at odds with current human values and biodiversity needs). Ongoing threats to climate and biodiversity, as well as shifting human values towards wildlife, require that the DNR rethink its purpose and policies. “Clarifying the DNR’s mandate around a top priority of conserving all wildlife for all people will provide a unifying direction for the floundering board and strengthen the department’s biodiversity mission. Changing the department’s purpose recognizes that government agencies require modifications as society’s needs and public values change.”

Read article as a PDF

Read more at Isthmus

Lead ammo and fishing tackle is dangerous for wildlife health, yet legislators resist ban

By Michael Doyle

US Fish and Wildlife Service plans to open and expand hunting and fishing at 19 wildlife refuges which will open up 54,000 acres of land to hunting and fishing. While the federal agency will limit these opportunities to non-lead shells, ammo, and tackle, opposing senators have argued that “Policies or actions that reduce or limit sportsmen activities necessarily implicate wildlife conservation programs by affecting state agencies’ revenue.” These legislators are holding funding hostage in wildlife policymaking by urging the FWS Director not to ban lead – a move that is detrimental to the health and safety of humans and wildlife alike.

Read more at E&E News

Former U.S. senator: Time for changes on the N.J. Fish and Wildlife Council

By Robert Torricelli

In this op-ed, former U.S. senator Torricelli makes the case for reform of the New Jersey Fish and Wildlife Council, explaining that many of the state’s regulations are not based on legitimate science. Torricelli talks about the “need to protect wildlife and all of our interests by changing the council to reflect our common humane values.”

Read more at NJ.com 

Whose values count most in determining Vermont’s fish and wildlife priorities, regulations and public policies?

Whose values count most

By Walter Medwid

In this op-ed Medwid writes, “Vermonters should rethink the focus of the Fish & Wildlife Department. Threats to biodiversity and shifting human values challenge the underpinnings of the department and the Fish & Wildlife Board…Whose values count most in determining Vermont’s fish and wildlife priorities, regulations, and public policies?”

Read more in the Vermont Digger 

Refocus Fish and Wildlife mandate on conservation

By Fred Koontz

In this op-ed by former Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission member Fred Koontz, he describes the current state of the state’s Department of Fish and Wildlife as a ‘political quagmire.’ This piece explores the internal struggles of the state agency and commission, often fueled by a ‘preservation-versus-harvest dichotomy’ and a 28 year old legislated mandate that needs to be revised in order to stop the rapid decline in biodiversity. “States are obligated to protect wildlife for current and future generations. The sad truth is that we are failing.”

Read more in The Seattle Times