Select Page

News & Commentary

A Small Group Can Change the World Because We Must

A Small Group Can Change the World Because We Must

A gray squirrel looks to the right in a blurred winter landscape. His face and tail and reddish points to the fur while his back and body and dark gray except for his white chest and throat. On the image, a quote in a white box reads, "“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." -Margaret Meade

Margaret Mead’s famous words—“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has”—have never felt more urgent than they do today. The stakes for wildlife, public lands, and democracy itself are higher than ever, and those in power know it. That’s why they’re working so hard to dismantle every safeguard, silence dissent, and put corporate interests ahead of ecological integrity.

We are living through an era where the most basic norms of governance and conservation are being destroyed in real-time. A government that once at least paid lip service to protecting public lands and wildlife has been handed over to profiteers and extractive industries. The recent mass firings at the Department of the Interior—gutting the very agencies tasked with stewarding our nation’s lands and wildlife—are just one example of the destruction unfolding before our eyes. National Park Service employees, Bureau of Land Management scientists, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologists—thousands of professionals who dedicated their lives to public service were tossed aside in an effort to strip the government of expertise and accountability.

These are the very people who protect our public lands, safeguard endangered species, and uphold the environmental laws that keep ecosystems functioning. And their dismissal is part of a broader effort to dismantle environmental protections in favor of industry profits.

To what end? To clear the way for billionaires and industry lobbyists to do as they please. To ensure that our national parks, public lands, and the wildlife that depend on them are no longer managed for the public good but instead serve the highest bidder. To rig the system even further in favor of those who already hold power, so that everyday people—those who actually care about the future of our planet—have even less say in what happens next.

We’ve seen this playbook before. Hollow out the agencies responsible for conservation. Silence scientists and experts. Rewrite the rules to favor extractive industries. The goal is clear: weaken any opposition to the destruction of our natural world. But here’s what they underestimate—people care. And when people care, they fight back.

But this is where Mead’s words come into play. The people behind this destruction are a small, powerful group. But so are we. And history shows that when determined people make a principled stand against injustice, they can change the course of history.

As an openly fascist administration guts environmental protections, fires thousands of federal workers, and hands over our public lands to the highest bidder, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed. But history tells us that when those in power act recklessly, ordinary people must rise to meet the moment.

Right now, it is easy to feel hopeless. The forces we are up against seem insurmountable. But the truth is, the fight for wildlife and wild places has always been an uphill battle. Those in power have always prioritized profit over protection, control over coexistence. Yet time and again, grassroots movements—people like you, like us—have fought back and won.

Those victories weren’t handed to us; they were won through relentless organizing, speaking out at meetings, and refusing to back down. There are so many examples that can serve as a testament to what happens when people come together with a shared vision for justice.

We don’t have the luxury of waiting for the system to fix itself. We are the system’s correction. Every time we show up at a wildlife commission meeting, demand transparency from decision-makers, or challenge the status quo, we are doing what those in power fear most: reminding them that this world does not belong to them alone.

This is not the time to step back. It is the time to lean in. To be louder. More relentless. More unapologetic in our demand for ethical, science-based, and just wildlife management. The people tearing apart protections for wildlife want us to believe that we are powerless—but they wouldn’t be working so hard to silence us if that were true.

Now is not the time for despair—it’s the time for action. We must demand better from our leaders. We must show up at wildlife commission meetings, contact lawmakers, and build coalitions that challenge the status quo. The forces seeking to undo decades of environmental progress may be powerful, but so is the will of an engaged public.

The only thing that has ever changed the world is a small, committed group of people willing to fight for what is right. We have no other choice but to be that group.

We are not powerless. We are not alone. And as history has proven time and again, a small group of committed people can, indeed, change the world. Join us. Speak up. Take action. The future of wildlife—and our shared future on this planet—depends on it.

5 Actions You Can Take Right Now for Wildlife: 

  1. Speak up at Wildlife Commission Meetings: State wildlife commissions make crucial decisions about hunting policies, predator management, and ecosystem protections—but they’re often dominated by special interests. Find your state’s next commission meeting and comment on plans or ask them to prioritize the State Wildlife Action Plan funding and programs to protect biodiversity.
  2. Contact your elected officials: State and federal lawmakers must hear from constituents who care about wildlife. Call or email them and demand federal funds be restored and employees who have been let go be rehired.
  3. Then, follow that with a demand to your federal elected officials that they halt Elon Musk’s unelected takeover of federal spending and federal agencies. He has not been appointed or confirmed to a position and what he is doing is illegal. Call your representatives and demand they stand up against attacks on wildlife and public lands. You can reach Congress through the switchboard at (202) 224-3121.
  4. If you can, volunteer your time. Nonprofits are the frontline of the fight in this moment and they need your assistance, your donations, and your voice.
  5. Finally, share this with everyone you can. Education is power! Share posts from us and other advocacy groups, talk to friends and family, and challenge the dominant narrative that wildlife only has value when they’re of use to us.
  6. BONUS: if you’re ready to take it even further, check out The General Strike US. Once they hit 10 million people, they’re calling for a mass strike to disrupt business as usual and demand real change.Direct action has a critical place in this fight. We need a full-spectrum approach—protests, occupations, and public demonstrations alongside strategic policy engagement, legal challenges, and sustained pressure on decision-makers. The more people we mobilize, the harder it becomes for them to ignore us. Let’s fight on all fronts!

 

Changing the Narrative to Change the Future

Changing the narrative is crucial to build the world we want to live in.

A coyote in the lower portion of the image faces right as it walks through a field of tall prairie grasses turning reddish brown in fall. The text on the image readds, "Changing the Narrative to Change the Future," and in the lower right-hand corner is the Wildlife for All logo in white.If we want to change society, we have to start by changing ideas. The way we do that? By shifting the conversation. And that means confronting the dominant narratives that keep us locked in the same destructive cycles.

For too long, wildlife management in the U.S. has been dominated by a singular perspective: that wildlife exists primarily as a “resource” to be used by humans. This idea is so deeply ingrained that it often goes unquestioned. It shapes policies, funding structures, and cultural attitudes.

It fuels the false belief that carnivores must be “controlled,” that hunting is the only valid form of conservation, that only hunters pay for conservation, and that ecosystems need human micromanagement rather than respect and protection.

Narrative change is about more than just countering misinformation—it’s about offering a new way of seeing the world. When we dismantle harmful stories, we make space for new ones to take hold. We create the conditions for real, lasting transformation.

So what does that look like? It means rejecting the idea that wolves and other carnivores are villains in some outdated frontier myth. It means challenging the notion that hunting interests should control wildlife agencies while everyone else is sidelined. It means pushing back against the belief that coexistence is some kind of radical idea when, in reality, it’s the only path forward—especially in the face of climate change and habitat destruction.

By shifting the conversation, we shift public perception. By shifting public perception, we shift policy. And when we shift policy, we change the future for wildlife.

This work isn’t easy, but it’s necessary. If we want to build a world where wildlife is valued for more than just its utility to humans, we have to start by rewriting the story.

Are you ready to be part of that change?

Black History Month is a Call to Action

Black History Month is a Call to Action: Why Wildlife Advocacy Must Include Justice for Black Communities

Red, yellow, green, and black geometric-shaped chunky lines surround an illustration that reads "Black History Month" with fists of power rising from letters.

Black History Month is a Call to Action

Why Wildlife Advocacy Must Include Justice for Black Communities

 

February is Black History Month—a time to celebrate the achievements, contributions, and resilience of Black communities. But it must also be a call to action. Recognizing Black history means reckoning with the systemic injustices that Black people have faced and continue to face in every aspect of society. For those of us in the wildlife advocacy space, it is not enough to focus solely on protecting animals while ignoring the struggles of marginalized people. Our movement must be intersectional, because justice for wildlife is inseparable from justice for people.

If we won every victory for wildlife—ended trophy hunting, reformed state wildlife agencies, banned cruel trapping, and restored habitats—but Black people in this country were still being disproportionately subjected to police violence, denied access to safe housing and healthcare, and never paid reparations for the fact that enslaved Africans built the United States into a global superpower, would that be a true victory?

Would we call it progress if wolves, grizzlies, and bison thrived, yet Black communities remained locked out of land ownership, environmental decision-making, and access to the outdoors due to structural racism? If state wildlife commissions reformed but continued to reflect the same privileged, exclusionary power structures that have historically silenced Black voices?

No. That would be a hollow, unacceptable victory.

Some people in animal and wildlife advocacy say, “We have to focus on the animals.” But focusing on wildlife does not mean ignoring people. If we want lasting conservation victories, we must fight for a world where all people—especially those who have been systemically oppressed—have safety, security, and access to resources. The same structures that allow the destruction of ecosystems, the poisoning of water, and the decimation of wildlife populations also uphold racial and economic injustices. The forces that prioritize profit over protection harm both animals and people, particularly Black, Indigenous, and other marginalized communities.

Ethical treatment of animals and the natural world is deeply intertwined with justice, compassion, and respect for all people. The concept of intersectionality—the idea that systems of oppression are interconnected, and the exploitation of animals, the destruction of nature, and the marginalization of people all stem from the same root causes of power imbalance, dominance, and exclusion—is a vital one to adopt in your advocacy.

You want to protect wolves, mountain lions, and other persecuted wildlife? Then you must also stand against the systems that treat Black people as expendable and deny them justice. Conservation cannot succeed in an unjust society.

A photo of a dictionary with the word "Justice" highlighted in green shows the importance of honoring Black History Month.Some in our movement say, “I just like animals more than people.” But we need you to care. We need you to recognize that the suffering of people and the suffering of animals are interconnected. The very policies that allow for the brutal slaughter of wolves, the destruction of forests, and the pollution of rivers are the same policies that exploit Black, Indigenous, and low-income communities.

Wildlife advocacy must be rooted in justice for all—because the same systems that exploit and harm people also destroy nature. When we say we “just care about animals,” we ignore the reality that people’s struggles are intertwined with the fight for a better world for all beings. You want to protect wolves, grizzlies, and wild places? That means fighting for policies where everyone—especially Black, Indigenous, and marginalized communities— can live safety, and access housing, food, education, and political power.

If you have room in your heart to fight for the lives of nonhuman animals, then you have room in your heart to acknowledge that justice for people matters just as much.

Black History Month isn’t just about remembrance—it’s about action. It’s about ensuring that the fight for justice is ongoing, that we don’t relegate Black history to the past while ignoring Black struggles in the present.

Wildlife advocates must ask:

  • Who has access to outdoor spaces, and who has historically been excluded?
  • Who benefits from conservation policies, and who is pushed out of decision-making?
  • How do we ensure that our fight for justice includes justice for Black communities?

We must uplift Black voices in conservation, support policies that protect both people and wildlife, and actively work to dismantle the systems that oppress both. This means advocating for environmental justice, supporting reparations for Black communities, and fighting for policies that ensure equitable access to nature and decision-making power.

You want to protect wolves, mountain lions, and other persecuted wildlife? Then you must also stand against the systems that treat Black people as expendable and deny them justice. True wildlife protection and conservation is about more than just saving species—it’s about transforming systems. It’s about ensuring that both human and nonhuman communities can thrive together. If we ignore racial and social justice in our work, we will fail in our mission to protect the natural world.

This Black History Month, let’s move beyond performative allyship and commit to real, lasting action. Justice for wildlife requires justice for people. And that starts with showing up, speaking out, and making space for those who have been historically excluded from the fight.

A just future for wildlife requires a just future for people. Black History Month reminds us: our fight must be intersectional, or it isn’t justice at all.

Celebrating Kevin Bixby

Celebrating Kevin Bixby: A Lifetime of Advocacy for Wildlife

Celebrating Kevin Bixby: A Lifetime of Advocacy for Wildlife After decades of tireless work to protect wildlife and wildlands, Kevin Bixby is retiring—leaving behind an incredible legacy of advocacy, courage, and leadership. Photo shows Kevin in an open field with piles of dead coyotes laying behind hiim and he looks down and to the right, putting his hands inside his large jacket.

Kevin Bixby grins at the camera. He's wearing a blue checked buttn-up shirt and has his graying brown hair parted to the left. His face is full of laugh lines and he sports a full mustache. Celebrating Kevin Bixby: A Lifetime of Advocacy for Wildlife

Celebrating Kevin Bixby: A Lifetime of Advocacy for Wildlife

After decades of tireless work to protect wildlife and wildlands, Kevin Bixby is retiring—leaving behind an incredible legacy of advocacy, courage, and leadership.

Kevin’s journey began in the early 1990s when he founded the Southwest Environmental Center (SWEC) in New Mexico. Under his leadership, SWEC became a powerful force for conservation, taking on threats to the region’s landscapes and the species that call them home. From restoring river ecosystems to challenging destructive policies, Kevin led with conviction and an unshakable belief in the intrinsic value of wildlife.

Through his work, Kevin came to a profound realization: As long as wildlife policy was controlled by those who viewed animals as little more than “resources” to be used, advocates would be stuck fighting the same battles over and over. Wildlife needed a new kind of governance—one that was democratic, science-driven, and rooted in compassion.

Kevin teaches a group of people seated with their backs to the camera along a long, U-shaped blue table. Behind him, a screen shows a projected presentation. So Kevin and his team at SWEC launched Wildlife for All, an organization and a national movement to reform state wildlife management and bring about systemic change. Under his leadership, Wildlife for All has challenged outdated policies, mobilized advocates across the country, and pushed for a future where wildlife is managed not for narrow interests, but for the health of entire ecosystems.

Kevin’s vision and determination have inspired so many of us. He has shown that real change is possible, even in the face of entrenched opposition. His legacy isn’t just in the organizations he’s built or the policies he’s influenced—it’s in the countless people he has mentored, empowered, and united in the fight for wildlife justice.

As Kevin steps into retirement, we celebrate his remarkable career and the movement he helped build. His work will continue to shape the future of wildlife management for years to come.

Thank you, Kevin, for everything you’ve done to make the world wilder, fairer, and more compassionate. Happy retirement!

February Wildlife Commission Meetings

It’s time to get active in February Wildlife Commission Meetings.

A small reddish-brown mink with a white snip of fur on her chest stands on a snowbank, looking alertly at the camera. Text in red on the image reads, "FEBRUARY WILDLIFE COMMISSION MEETINGS, Your voice is needed."

February Wildlife Commission Meetings

Month two of 2025, wildlife advocates! Amp up your involvement in this second month of the year.

Wildlife commission meetings are critical opportunities to influence state policies and ensure that wildlife is managed in a way that reflects ecological principles and public values. Your voice matters. Whether you choose to attend in person, speak virtually, or submit comments, participating in these meetings is a meaningful way to stand up for wildlife.

Below is the list of every state with a wildlife commission meeting in February, listed from first to last by date. As you plan your comments and engagement, use the resources on our Resources Page and Advocacy Toolkit to prepare. Check below for meeting details by state and instructions for how to engage. Let’s make a difference!

 

Oklahoma

Meeting Date: February 3

Location: Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation 1801 N. Lincoln Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK 73105

Details: Click here for agenda and details

Notes: Meeting starts at 9 a.m. It’s not clear how to comment or speak; we suggest emailing the department to ask. It’s also unclear if there is a virtual participation option. Read more on their website.

 

North Carolina

Meeting Date: February 5-6

Location: Raleigh

Details: Click here for agenda and details

Notes: The first day is mostly committee meetings before the whole commission meets. February 5 Agenda and schedule, and Zoom. February 6 Agenda and Zoom. The website says to register for virtual/Zoom attendance in advance but does not list a deadline. Unless otherwise specified, all meetings are held at Commission Headquarters in Raleigh.

 

Louisiana

Meeting Date: February 6

Location: LDWF Headquarters, Joe L. Herring Room, 2000 Quail Drive, Baton Rouge, LA 70808

Details: Click here for agenda and details

Notes: The website does not have an agenda up yet and it is unclear how to speak or comment, as well as if virtual participation is allowed. From the website: “The Commission meets the first Thursday of every month. Unless otherwise noted, Commission meetings begin at 9:30 am. Commission meetings are open to the public. A live audio/video stream of each meeting is also available via Zoom for those who are not able to attend in person.”

 

Missouri

Meeting Date: February 6-7

Location: MDC Headquarters, 2901 W Truman Blvd., Jefferson City, MO 65102

Details: Click here for agenda and details

Notes: Thursday, Feb. 6, 10 a.m. – Workshop and Closed Executive Session. Friday, Feb. 7, 8:30 a.m. – Regular Open Meeting. Any person who would like to comment to the Commission about a specific agenda item must make a written request to the Director at least four calendar days prior to the meeting. The time allotted for public comment and the number of speakers will be at the Commission’s discretion.

 

Colorado – office hours with Commissioner Bailey

Meeting Date: February 7

Location: Virtual

Details: Commissioner Karen Bailey is hosting office hours to discuss CPW topics from 10- 11 a.m. on Friday, February 7. If you have specific topics you want to discuss with Commissioner Bailey, please email her directly at karen.bailey@state.co.us. You can join the meeting virtually using Zoom.

 

New Jersey

Meeting Date: February 11

Location: Assunpink Wildlife Management Area – Central Region Office, Large Conference Room,1 Eldridge Rd., Robbinsville Twp, NJ 08691

Details: Click here for agenda and details

Notes: The public is welcome to attend and participate in the public portion of each meeting. Meeting starts at 10 a.m. and will be held both in person and via GoToMeeting  (audio only). Per the website, public comments may be made in person or online and will be limited to 3 minutes per person. More information about the Commission is on its website, including a meeting guide and how to connect. For help, contact Kristen.Meistrell@dep.nj.gov.

 

California

Meeting Date: February 12-13

Location: Sacramento HQ; California Natural Resources Headquarters Building
Second Floor, 715 P Street, Sacramento, CA 95814

Details: At time of webpage publishing, the agenda link was broken but the meeting document index has some details.

Notes: Commission meetings are live-streamed (also referred to as a live webcast) with full audio and video. If you simply want to observe the meeting, but do not wish to comment on any item, we encourage you to view the live webcast available at www.fgc.ca.gov. How to join (if you plan to provide comment). More on all meetings in 2025.

 

Iowa

Meeting Date: February 12

Location: Des Moines

Details: Click here for agenda and details. (Agenda not available at time of webpage publishing.)

Notes: The meeting starts at 10 a.m. Teleconference functionality is usually available but was not on the website at the time this webpage was published. Comments regarding agenda items may be submitted for public record to Alicia.Plathe@dnr.iowa.gov or 6200 Park Ave Ste 200, Des Moines IA 50321 up to 24 hours prior to the business meeting.

 

Michigan

Meeting Date: February 13

Location: Lansing Community College – Downtown, 600 North Grand Avenue, Michigan Room, Lansing, MI 48933

Details: Click here for agenda and details.

Notes: Meeting starts at 9:30 a.m. Persons registering to provide comments on a topic listed on the agenda on or before the Friday preceding the meeting will be allowed up to 5 minutes for their comments. Persons registering to comment on a topic not listed on the agenda, after the Friday preceding the meeting, or at the meeting will be allowed up to 3 minutes. If you are unable to attend the meeting but wish to submit written comments on agenda items, please write to Natural Resources Commission, P.O. Box 30028, Lansing, Michigan 48909, or email nrc@michigan.gov. Read more on the Commission website.

 

Montana

Meeting Date: February 13

Location: Zoom only

Details: Click here for agenda and details. 

Notes: Meeting starts at 8:30 a.m. Public comments will be accepted on the proposals in the agenda through January 28, 2025. Public comment is always welcome during the Zoom meeting. Register to comment via Zoom by February 12.

 

Oregon

Meeting Date: February 13-14

Location:Kliever Memorial Armory, 10000 NE 33rd Dr., Portland, OR 97211

Details: February 13 workshop agenda | February 14 meeting agenda

Notes: The workshop on February 13 starts at 1 p.m. The meeting on February 14 starts at 8 a.m. Comment and testimony are limited to 3 minutes or less. Submit written comments and/or register to speak virtually by 8 a.m., Wednesday, February 12. Those who would like to provide virtual testimony must register no less than 48 hours in advance to receive a testimony link to the meeting. To provide testimony on an agenda item in-person, registration will be available at the meeting. To provide in-person public comment, fill out a “Witness Registration” form available at the meeting.

 

Washington

Meeting Date: February 13-15

Location: Olympia

Details: Click here for agenda and details (note no agenda is available at the time of webpage publishing)

Notes: Registration for those wishing to provide virtual comments closes at 5 p.m. the day before the meeting begins. Registrants will be called upon and typically have 3 minutes to speak. If you are unable to participate, you can submit your comments on the Commission contact page.

 

Arizona 

Meeting Date: February 14

Location: Region IV

Details: No agenda is available yet.

Notes: Members of the public may view the meeting from any Department Regional Office. Members of the public attending in person wanting to speak on a specific agenda item may submit Speaker Cards (Blue Cards) if they wish to speak to the Commission and may only address the Commission by attending in person or from any regional office. Copies of any presentations, documents, etc. discussed during the meeting will be available by contacting sprice@azgfd.gov. No discussion or action will be taken by the Commission on topics raised in public comment. Any items requiring further discussion or action will be included on a future Commission meeting agenda. View live webcasts at www.azgfd.gov/commissioncam.


Hawai’i #1

Meeting Date: February 14

Location: 1151 Punchbowl St. Room 132 (Kalanimoku Building), Honolulu, Hawai‘i

Details: Meeting agendas are posted at least 6 days prior to the date of the meeting but an agenda for this month was not available when this webpage was posted. Keep checking back on this webpage.

Notes: Meeting starts at 9.a.m. Attend in person and arrive at least 15 minutes prior to the meeting start time in order to add your name to the sign-in sheet. To speak virtually, email blnr.testimony@hawaii.gov. Include your name and the agenda item on which you would like to testify. Once your request has been received, you will receive an email with the Zoom link. Requests may be also made during the meeting. Meetings will be livestreamed at: https://youtube.com/c/boardoflandandnaturalresourcesdlnr  To submit a comment, email blnr.testimony@hawaii.gov no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting to ensure time for BLNR Member review.

 

New Hampshire

Meeting Date: February 18

Location:Fish and Game Headquarters, 11 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH

Details: Agenda was not available when this webpage was published. Keep checking this webpage for details.

Notes: Meetings are generally at 1 p.m. on the third Tuesday of every month. Meetings of the NH Fish and Game Commission are open to the public, unless otherwise noted.

 

Arkansas 

Meeting Date: February 19-20

Location: Little Rock

Details:  Click here for agenda and details (note no agenda is online at time of webpage publishing).

Notes: Unclear how to speak at meetings or provide virtual testimony or written comments. 2025 meeting schedule is here.

 

Maryland

Meeting Date: February 19

Location: Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service, 580 Taylor Avenue, Tawes State Office Building, E-1, Annapolis MD 21401

Details: No agenda was available at time of webpage publishing; meeting schedule is listed at the end of the January agenda.

Notes: Google Meet. Note: Unless notified otherwise, all meetings will be held via Google Meet. When meeting in person, they will be held in the C-4 Conference Room of the Department of Natural Resources—Tawes State Office Building beginning at 10:30 a.m. Available parking is located at the Navy Stadium Parking Lot. Send written comments to wac.dnr@maryland.gov.

 

Ohio

Meeting Date: February 19

Location: Wildlife District 1 Office, 1500 Dublin Rd., Columbus, OH

Details: Click here for agenda and details 

Notes: Comments for open forums during Ohio Wildlife Council meetings must be about a current rule proposal. If you have a topic that is not a current rule proposal, please email the council with your comment or question (wildlife.council@dnr.ohio.gov), or speak to a council member before or after a meeting. If the topic falls within the wildlife, fish, or law section, feel free to reach out at our open houses or email the Division of Wildlife at wildinfo@dnr.ohio.gov.  Speakers must register by 5 p.m. Monday, February 17. The Public Comment Form must be completed and submitted to wildlife.council@dnr.ohio.gov. Along with the form, submit any handouts you plan to provide.
Speakers are limited to 3 minutes. There will be a maximum of ten speaker slots available. PowerPoint presentations are not permitted.

 

 

Vermont

Meeting Date: February 19

Location: Dewey Building, National Life Drive, Montpelier, VT 05620

Details: No agenda was available at time of webpage publishing; check this page routinely for updates

Notes: Meeting starts at 5 p.m. No information on how to speak or comment. The board usually meets on the third Wednesday of each month at 5 p.m. to review rules currently being proposed to the Board. Review the Board’s website for more details including the 2025 meeting schedule.

 

South Carolina

Meeting Date: February 20

Location: Room 107-108 Botany Bay Board Room on the 1st floor of SCDNR Headquarters at 260 D Epting Lane in West Columbia in the State Farmer’s Market complex on Highway 321

Details: Click here for agenda and details

Notes: Meeting starts at 10 a.m. Anyone wishing to make comments to the Board please email your name and topic to board@dnr.sc.gov at least 24 hours in advance. Contact Sandy Rucker 803-734-9102 or ruckers@dnr.sc.gov for assistance.

 

Tennessee

Meeting Date: February 20-21

Location: Nashville

Details: Click here for agenda and details (note no agenda is available at the time of webpage publishing)

Notes: No agenda listed and it is unclear how to watch remotely, or how to provide comments.

 

Illinois – Endangered Species Protection Board

Meeting Date: February 21

Location: Illinois Department of Natural Resources’ Director’s Boardroom, One Natural Resources Way, Springfield, IL 62702

Details: Meeting starts at 10 a.m. in the  A virtual meeting option will be available. Read more.

 

West Virginia

Meeting Date: February 23

Location: Marshall University Memorial Student Center, 1 John Marshall Drive, Huntington, WV 25755

Details: Click here for agenda and details (note no agenda or detailed meeting information is available at time of webpage publishing)

Notes: Meeting starts at 1 p.m. Send comments to wvnrcommission@wv.gov.

 

Georgia

Meeting Date: February 25

Location:DNR Board Room 2 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, SE Suite 1252 East, Atlanta, GA 30334

Details: Click here for details. (note the meeting agenda was not available at time of webpage publishing)

Notes: Meeting starts at 9 a.m.It is unclear how to sign up to speak, submit a comment, or if virtual participation is possible. Here is the full 2025 meeting schedule.

 

Wisconsin

Meeting Date: February 25-26

Location: Rm. G09, State Natural Resources Bldg. (GEF 2), 101 S. Webster St., Madison WI 53703. Enter the building at the 101 S. Webster St. entrance and take the hallway to the right to the reception desk.

Details: Click here for agenda and meeting details (note no agenda is available at time of website publishing).

Notes:The Natural Resources Board will meet in-person. Remote testimony from the
public via Zoom may be accepted for this meeting. In person public appearances are
also welcome. Members of the public can submit their request to testify remotely, in
person, or their written comments by the posted deadline date for Board
consideration, typically one week before the meeting date.

Florida

Meeting Date: February 26-27

Location: FSU Student Union, Ballroom E, 75 N. Woodward Ave., Tallahassee, FL 32304

Details: Click here for agenda and meeting details

Notes: Meeting starts at 8:30 a.m. each day. Public comments will be accepted in person during the meeting. For in-person comments, please review the speaker registration guidelines at https://myfwc.com/about/commission/. Advance comments are due by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, February 21. If you would like to provide comments via mail, please send those comments to: FWC Commissioners, 620 South Meridian Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399.

Hawai’i #2

Meeting Date: February 28

Location: 1151 Punchbowl St. Room 132 (Kalanimoku Building), Honolulu, Hawai‘i

Details: Meeting agendas are posted at least 6 days prior to the date of the meeting but an agenda for this month was not available when this webpage was posted. Keep checking back on this webpage.

Notes: Meeting starts at 9.a.m. Attend in person and arrive at least 15 minutes prior to the meeting start time in order to add your name to the sign-in sheet. To speak virtually, email blnr.testimony@hawaii.gov. Include your name and the agenda item on which you would like to testify. Once your request has been received, you will receive an email with the Zoom link. Requests may be also made during the meeting. Meetings will be livestreamed at: https://youtube.com/c/boardoflandandnaturalresourcesdlnr  To submit a comment, email blnr.testimony@hawaii.gov no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting to ensure time for BLNR Member review.

Nevada Wildlife Commission rejects petition to protect mountain lions

The Nevada Wildlife Commission rejects petition to protect mountain lions, reform trapping regulations

Image of a mountain lion paw caught in a metal leghold trap. The Nevada wildlife commission rejects petition to update trapping regulations to protect mountain lions.

Image courtesy of Nevada Wildlife Alliance.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 25, 2024

Wildlife Commission leaves mountain lions unprotected, denies petition to update trapping regulations

Nevada’s trappers will continue to have 96 hours to check traps

RENO, Nev.—Today, The Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners voted to deny a petition that sought to change trapping regulations to protect mountain lions from injury and death. The petition–which was brought by the Nevada Wildlife Alliance, WildEarth Guardians, and several citizens–included eight recommended changes to Nevada’s trapping regulations based on the best available science, professional trapper advice, and public polling. Ten commissioners representing hunting and agriculture interests voted against the petition.

“This decision is a missed opportunity to bring Nevada’s wildlife policies in line with science and public values,” said Michelle Lute, PhD in wildlife management and executive director of Wildlife for All. “Mountain lions are vital to maintaining healthy ecosystems, yet the Commission has once again prioritized the narrow interests of a dwindling minority over ecological integrity and the broad public interest. By rejecting this modest, science-based petition, the Commission not only undermines Nevada’s natural heritage but also fails in its responsibility to conserve and protect wildlife for future generations.”

During commissioner discussion, none of the eight recommendations were meaningfully considered by any commissioners.

“Nevadans are so used to this commission failing to take public concerns and wildlife science seriously that this isn’t a surprise. Nevada’s trapping regulations will continue to be the worst in the West until someone steps up,” said Chris Smith, wildlife program director for WildEarth Guardians. “Mountain lions, other native species, and people and pets clearly don’t matter compared to the tiny minority of Nevadans who trap.”

A 2023 poll found that 67% of Nevadans believe that 96 hours between trap check intervals is too long and needs to be shortened.

“In the big picture of wildlife stewardship, these changes were very modest and common-sense, and they could have been implemented easily to help bring Nevada more in line with other Western states,” stated R. Brent Lyles, executive director of the Mountain Lion Foundation. “We’re very disappointed that the Commission decided to allow this ongoing and needless violence against Nevada’s native cats to continue.”

According to state data from just nine years (2002-2004, 2007, 2010-2015), even though mountain lion trapping is illegal in Nevada, at least 278 mountain lions were caught in traps that were set for other animals. Eleven of those lions were injured and 24 died. Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW) data indicate that not all trappers report their non-target catches. The actual number of lions that have been killed or injured due to Nevada’s trapping regulations is unknown, and is likely significantly higher.

Mountain lions are Nevada’s only extant apex carnivore, and studies show that species like lions have substantial and measurable benefits for ecosystems including river-corridor health, increased biodiversity, disease control, and even carbon sequestration.  

The petition recommended shortening the trap check window to 24 hours in accordance with recommendations from the American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians. The window is currently 96 hours, which is the longest in the continental American West. Other recommendations included limiting trap sizes, requiring trap-chain swivels, prohibiting drags (attaching traps to rocks, logs, or other moveable objects), and requiring trapper education.

###

 

New Mexico Wildlife Reform Bill Introduced

A New Mexico wildlife reform bill introduced today offers a comprehensive, three-pronged approach to modernize wildlife management and protect New Mexico’s rich biodiversity.

An image of Shiprock in New Mexico at sunset. The mountain is on the left side of the image, nearly silhouetted by the facing sky full of purples, pinks, and soft blues. text in the image reads, "New Mexico Deserves MODERN, 21st Century Wildlife Management. A new reform bill introduced today offers a comprehensive, three-pronged approach to modernize wildlife management and protect New Mexico’s rich biodiversity."

New Mexico Deserves 21st Century Wildlife Management

New Mexico is home to a remarkable diversity of wildlife, which enriches our cultural traditions and drives a $3.2 billion outdoor recreation economy. But our current wildlife management system, largely unchanged since the early 20th century, is no longer equipped to address the challenges of today. 

From declining wildlife populations to habitat loss and climate change, it’s clear we need a modernized, equitable system that reflects the values of all New Mexicans. Wildlife for All has led the charge on this front for years, and we’re excited to announce that a broad coalition has come together to support SB5, Game Commission Reform. This reform package bill offers a comprehensive, three-pronged approach to modernize wildlife management and protect New Mexico’s rich biodiversity for future generations.

Image from the Albequerque Journal of a column by Judy Calman New Mexico wildlife reform billUpdating the Mission for Wildlife

The first step is updating the Department of Game & Fish’s mission to reflect the evolving ways New Mexicans connect with wildlife. For decades, wildlife management in New Mexico has been disproportionately focused on game species, leaving many non-game species without adequate protection. From hikers and birdwatchers to photographers and wildlife advocates, our love for wildlife transcends hunting and fishing alone. However, the Department’s outdated mission and funding limit its ability to manage all wildlife species, leaving many vulnerable to threats like wildfires, flooding, and habitat loss. Modernizing the mission will enable the Department to address today’s challenges and prioritize the conservation of all wildlife, including species critical to healthy ecosystems.  

Reforming the Game Commission

The second piece of the package addresses the broken State Game Commission, a decision-making body whose original purpose was to shield wildlife management from politics. But in recent decades, commissions have become very politicized. SB5 addresses this issue with reforms to ensure that the Commission is balanced, science-based, and representative of all New Mexicans. It will establish clear qualifications for Commissioners, ensuring they bring expertise in areas like biology, conservation, and rural and urban interests. It also ensures input from underrepresented groups, such as Indigenous communities, to reflect the diverse values of all New Mexicans. By giving wildlife experts, tribal communities, and all stakeholders across the state a voice, we can build a system that better reflects the diverse values of New Mexicans.

Securing Sustainable Funding

Lastly, SB5 tackles the looming funding crisis. The Department of Game & Fish is primarily funded through hunting and fishing license fees, which haven’t increased in nearly 20 years. This system is unsustainable and excludes many New Mexicans who enjoy and benefit from wildlife in other ways, such as hiking, birdwatching, and photography. SB5 proposes modest increases in license fees, along with additional diversified funding sources, like $10 million from the Government Results and Opportunity Fund, to secure sustainable, equitable funding for wildlife conservation. This balanced approach will provide sustainable funding to protect New Mexico’s wildlife and landscapes.

Wildlife conservation must serve everyone, not just a select few. Historically, wildlife management systems across the U.S. have excluded diverse perspectives and prioritized a narrow set of interests. SB5 represents an opportunity to build a more inclusive system that values all New Mexicans and the ways they connect with nature. By addressing structural inequities, we can ensure that wildlife conservation contributes to broader environmental justice goals, benefiting people and ecosystems alike.

SB5 reflects the collective efforts of wildlife advocates, environmentalists, animal protection supporters, hunters, anglers, conservationists, and community leaders who share a commitment to preserving New Mexico’s wildlife heritage. With support from organizations ranging from Animal Protection New Mexico and Audubon Southwest to Trout Unlimited  and the New Mexico Wildlife Federation, the reform bill reflects the values of all New Mexicans who cherish our wildlife heritage.

Now is the time to act. By modernizing our wildlife management system, we can ensure thriving ecosystems, healthy wildlife populations, and a sustainable future for generations to come. 

Image from the Las Cruces Bulletin of a letter to the editor on this New Mexico wildlife reform bill from Peter Ossorio

Wildlife Commissioners Who Stand For Wildlife Become Targets

When wildlife commissioners stand for true wildlife conservation, they become targets of the pro-trophy hunting lobby.A clipping from the Colorado Sun, December 11, 2024.the headline reads, "Hunting groups sue Colorado wildlife commissioners over mountain lion hunting op-ed ahead of election."

 

When Wildlife Commissioners Stand for Wildlife, They Become Targets

Last fall, three current and former Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) Commissioners signed on to an opinion piece showing support for the Proposition 127 ballot initiative. Their courageous endorsement reflects a commitment to protecting Colorado’s mountain lions, lynx, and bobcats from trophy hunting, trapping, and unnecessary harm. However, their principled stance has generated backlash from pro-trophy hunting groups, culminating in a lawsuit.

The lawsuit suggests that signing an op-ed advocating for mountain lion protection somehow violates the state’s open meetings law, which stretches legal reasoning to absurd lengths, suggesting this criticism is less about lawbreaking and more about intimidation. The goal appears to discourage other commissioners from advocating for ethical wildlife policies that center coexistence by making an example of those who dare to speak up.

This isn’t the first time such tactics have been used. In Washington, wildlife commissioner Lorna Smith faced similar legal harassment for her pro-wildlife stance while Dr. Fred Koontz, a former Washington wildlife commissioner, resigned after facing intense political pressure and hostility from special interest groups, illustrating the personal toll these tactics take on those who prioritize ethical wildlife stewardship.

A screenshot of a LinkedIn post by the lead attorney for the Sportsmen's Alliance. The post reads; "We couldn't sue two Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commissioners for publishing an Op-Ed in support of Prop 127--even though it was full of blatantly false assertions while ironically claiming that as commissioners, they “are held to a higher standard … of science, not mere opinion and conjecture.” So Sportsmen's Alliance and Safari Club International did the next best thing. We sued them for violating Colorado's Open Meeting Law, which prohibits the commissioners from discussing public business in private settings without prior notice to the public. #WeFightForYou"These lawsuits are part of a troubling pattern—well-funded groups weaponizing the courts to stifle the speech of wildlife commissioners who espouse a different ideology. Is this really about preserving tradition, or is it about maintaining power and control to protect the status quo?

I’d argue it’s the latter. Groups like the ones bringing this lawsuit demand “non-ideological” appointees to wildlife commissions when appointees have backgrounds in coexistence or ecological stewardship but don’t object when appointees come from hunting, agricultural, or industry backgrounds that align with their consumptive values. Why is it acceptable to champion one ideology while silencing another?

This double standard reinforces outdated values and undermines democratic processes. Wildlife commissions are meant to represent diverse perspectives and prioritize decision-making for wildlife as part of the public trust. When intimidation tactics force out commissioners who support science-based, compassionate policies, we all lose. 

For instance, former wildlife commissioner appointee Gary Skiba—a respected career CPW biologist—stepped down after enduring a smear campaign. Other commissioners nationwide have faced escalating threats that jeopardize their safety and that of their families, forcing them to resign. Why should standing for wildlife protection come at such a high personal cost?

These attacks are not just undemocratic; they’re counterproductive. Colorado’s wildlife belongs to all Coloradans, and decisions about their lives should reflect public values, science, and ethics—not the narrow interests of trophy hunting groups. The CPW commissioners who supported Prop 127 exemplify these principles, yet they face harassment for prioritizing long-term ecological health over short-term gains.

As environmental crises escalate, we need leaders willing to challenge the status quo and advocate for ethical stewardship. The question isn’t whether we can afford to prioritize coexistence; it’s whether we can afford not to. Colorado’s wildlife heritage depends on our ability to rise above narrow interests and embrace policies that reflect compassion, science, and public trust.

Colorado’s wildlife belongs to all Coloradans. Decisions about their future should be made by leaders guided by science, ethics, and a commitment to public interest, not by the influence of special interest groups. Now, more than ever, we as advocates need to stand up for leaders who prioritize responsible stewardship and who support wildlife protection rooted in the values of compassion, science, and ethics.

Wildlife for All stands with these wildlife commissioners and ask all Coloradans who care about ethical and science-driven wildlife management to do the same. 

StaffMichelle Lute, PhD, is a former state wildlife biologist in New Mexico and the Executive Director of Wildlife for All, an organization dedicated to just, democratic, and compassionate wildlife management.

Make Nuisance Trapping in California More Humane

A mother opposum sits on a tree branch in the summer with green leaves blurred in the background. Three babies peek over her back, their faces just visible. Text in a yellow box urges people in California to help make nuisance trapping more humane, stating "CALIFORNIA: SPEAK OUT FOR HUMANE WILDLIFE CONTROL" in white, capitalized letters.

Tell the WRC: Make Nuisance Trapping in California More Humane

Did you know that much of the trapping happening in your state or community isn’t for fur or sport, but under “nuisance animal” laws? These laws allow year-round trapping of many species, often with little oversight or accountability. Unfortunately, this means countless animals are caught in inhumane traps, suffering needlessly without any regard for their ecological role or welfare.

That’s why humane wildlife operators are some of the strongest advocates in our coalition. These professionals specialize in teaching coexistence and safe exclusion methods for dealing with wildlife in homes and buildings—no poisons, no traps. They represent the future of compassionate wildlife management, showing that coexistence is not only possible but practical.

Action Alert for California

Tomorrow, January 15, the California Wildlife Resources Committee (WRC) meets at 9 a.m. PT in Sacramento to discuss several critical wildlife management topics. This informal meeting provides an opportunity for dialogue and collaboration on state policies. 

On the agenda is Item 5, a proposed amendment to  California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 472, concerning the ways nongame animals can be killed. 

Our coalition’s humane wildlife operators are advocating for critical revisions to this proposal, including editing section 401, regarding issuance of permits for animals who cause damage, as well to:

  1. Specify the list of native species that can be trapped and killed.
  2. Shorten the allowed time length for traps to minimize suffering.
  3. Add a clause requiring that animals who cannot be relocated must be humanely euthanized immediately.

Right now there is little protection for nongame mammals suspected of causing damage to property – no bag limits, no time limits – which, as was brought to the attention of the Committee, is not in keeping with the Commission’s own policies. This is alarming for anyone who cares about ethical, science-based, and humane wildlife management.

Make sure your comments are respectful. This agenda is a dialogue and our partners are proposing changes to the WRC that aim to reduce unnecessary suffering and ensure that California’s wildlife policies prioritize ethics and coexistence over outdated methods. We  need buy-in rather than opposition!

How You Can Help

If you live in California, your voice is crucial! Here are three ways you can take action:

  1. Email the WRC to share your support for humane amendments to Section 472 and to add protections for animals to Section 401 (see bold bullet under #2).
  2. Attend the WRC meeting virtually or in person.
    • When you comment, tell commissioners you’d like the same protection for ALL native carnivores—from wild canids, like fox and coyotes, to other native meso-predators like badgers, skunks and raccoons—that is given to bobcats, beaver, deer, elk and gray squirrels through regulation Title 14 Section 401, which requires a person to apply for a permit to take animals suspected of damaging property.
  3. Spread the word about humane wildlife management practices and the importance of coexistence.

California has an opportunity to lead the way in creating compassionate and science-based wildlife policies. Let’s ensure that animals, ecosystems, and ethical values are at the heart of every decision. Together, we can hold the line for wildlife and work toward a better future for all species.